ROANOKE v. BRAY, 161 Va. 609 (1933)

171 S.E. 927

CITY OF ROANOKE v. J. B. BRAY AND NANCY ELLEN BRAY, and CITY OF ROANOKE v. RALPH J. RITCHIE AND C. L. STAFFORD, RECEIVERS, ETC., and CITY OF ROANOKE v. KATE L. HUFF

36644Supreme Court of Virginia.
November 16, 1933

Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Epes, Hudgins and Browning, JJ.

Error to judgments of the Hustings Court of the city of Roanoke, in proceedings against a city for correction of assessments. Judgments for applicants.

Reversed.

The opinion states the case.

Robert C. Jackson, for the plaintiff in error.

Woods, Chitwood, Coxe Rogers and Murray A. Foster, for the defendants in error.

Showalter, Parsons, Kuyk Coleman, for Ritchie, defendant in error.

HOLT, J., delivered the opinion of the court.

These cases are controlled by City of Norfolk v. Snyder, ante, page 288, 170 S.E. 721; City of Roanoke v. Gibson, et als., ante, page 342, 170 S.E. 723, and City of Roanoke v. Williams, ante, page 351, 170 S.E. 726, decided by this court at its September term, 1933. It follows that the judgment appealed from in each instance must be reversed and the assessments, set aside by the trial court, reinstated. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Page 610