Record No. 2752-95-4Court of Appeals of Virginia.
May 14, 1996
Appeal from the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission.
(M. Lynn McHale; Siciliano, Ellis, Dyer Boccarosse, on brief), for appellants.
(Metin A. Cay; Swiger Cay, on brief), for appellee.
Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton.
MEMORANDUM OPINION[*]
PER CURIAM
Woodward Lothrop and its insurer (hereinafter collectively referred to as “employer”) contend that the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in finding that Scott Wayne Talbott (“claimant”) proved that back fusion surgery to be performed by Dr. Paul Griffith was reasonable and necessary treatment of claimant’s compensable injury by accident. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission’s decision. Rule 5A:27.
On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Factual findings made by the commission will be upheld on appeal if supported by credible evidence. James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). “A question raised by conflicting medical opinion is a question of fact.” Commonwealthv. Powell, 2 Va. App. 712, 714, 347 S.E.2d 532, 533 (1986).
In its role as fact finder, the commission was entitled to accept the opinions of Drs. Griffith, Eli M. Lippman, and Mark S. Rosenthal that the fusion surgery was reasonable and necessary, and to reject the contrary opinions of Drs. Neil Kahanovitz, Richard S. Materson, and John B. Cohen. The opinions of Drs. Griffith, Lippman, and Rosenthal constitute credible evidence to support the commission’s decision. The existence of “contrary evidence in the record is of no consequence if there is credible evidence to support the commission’s finding.” Wagner Enters.,Inc. v. Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890, 894, 407 S.E.2d 32, 35 (1991).
We find no merit in employer’s argument that the commission erred in not giving more weight to the opinion of Dr. Kahanovitz, a treating physician. The record showed that Dr. Griffith, who unequivocally recommended that claimant undergo the surgery, had treated claimant since his December 1990 accident. Dr. Kahanovitz did not begin treating claimant until May 1992. Drs. Lippman and Rosenthal had also treated and examined claimant in arriving at their conclusions.
For these reasons, we affirm the commission’s decision.
Affirmed.